MoCoRunning






Girls - Quince Orchard XC Ranking Team Analytics

🏅 Thank You for 20 Years
416 rankings published • 1,929 athletes ranked • 30,000 race performances • 750,000 calculations • 0 opinions

All-Time Analytics: Boys Girls Boys and Girls Combined

Mocorunning's XC rankings date back to the 2006 season. Click a team name to see current season stats versus all-time stats for this school.

Girls - All-Time Highest End-of-Season (EOS) Z-ScoresA

Rank Name School Season Points EOS Rank Z-Score
1 Cara Harrison Quince Orchard 2006 394.00 2 2.44
2 Aimee Moores Quince Orchard 2008 280.50 7 1.97
3 Isabelle Latour Quince Orchard 2012 264.80 8 1.63
4 Regina Schreiber Quince Orchard 2013 245.00 7 1.62
5 Aimee Moores Quince Orchard 2007 283.10 7 1.41
6 Stephanie Joson Quince Orchard 2009 257.30 8 1.38
7 Olivia Donmoyer Quince Orchard 2025 238.00 9 1.32
8 Isabelle Latour Quince Orchard 2011 219.40 9 1.29
9 Cierra Wells Quince Orchard 2012 220.90 16 1.13
10 Stephanie Joson Quince Orchard 2008 201.10 13 1.09
10 Isabelle Sajonia Quince Orchard 2017 212.30 12 1.09
12 Regina Schreiber Quince Orchard 2012 205.50 18 0.95
13 Aimee Moores Quince Orchard 2006 221.30 13 0.79
14 Madeline Kelly Quince Orchard 2008 174.20 16 0.78
15 Maya Jacobson Quince Orchard 2015 179.50 23 0.77
16 Stephanie Joson Quince Orchard 2007 216.60 15 0.76
17 Cierra Wells Quince Orchard 2013 163.50 28 0.65
18 Cierra Wells Quince Orchard 2014 159.60 25 0.45
19 Margaret Lilyestrom Quince Orchard 2017 143.00 32 0.31
20 Maya Jacobson Quince Orchard 2016 139.80 26 0.27
21 Isabelle Sajonia Quince Orchard 2015 132.50 29 0.25
22 Isabelle Sajonia Quince Orchard 2016 135.20 27 0.21
23 Elizabeth Hobbs Quince Orchard 2012 129.20 31 0.09
24 Catherine Panasenkov Quince Orchard 2012 123.10 34 0.02

Girls - Hypothetical All-Time Team Clash Based on Z-ScoreB

Rank School Season Scoring Breakdown Team Score
1 Quince Orchard 2012
3+9+11+22+23
Isabelle Latour (3), Cierra Wells (9), Regina Schreiber (11), Elizabeth Hobbs (22), Catherine Panasenkov (23)
68
2 Quince Orchard 2008
2+10+13+29+42
Aimee Moores (2), Stephanie Joson (10), Madeline Kelly (13), Shannon Wagner (29), Julia Shapiro (42)
96
3 Quince Orchard 2006
1+12+24+27+36
Cara Harrison (1), Aimee Moores (12), Violeta Duncan (24), Stephanie Joson (27), Anh-Chi Do (36)
100
4 Quince Orchard 2011
8+25+35+37+48
Isabelle Latour (8), Catherine Panasenkov (25), Keegan Van Wert (35), Julia Shapiro (37), Cierra Wells (48)
153
5 Quince Orchard 2013
4+16+38+46+51
Regina Schreiber (4), Cierra Wells (16), Megan McDanald (38), Keegan Van Wert (46), Kate Coulson (51)
155
6 Quince Orchard 2016
19+21+32+47+49
Maya Jacobson (19), Isabelle Sajonia (21), Margaret Lilyestrom (32), Sara Mercer (47), Natalie Nyborg (49)
168

Girls - Largest Consecutive Season Z-Score ImprovementC

Rank Name School Season Leap Z1 Z2 Improvement
1 Cierra Wells Quince Orchard 2011 -> 2012 -0.97 1.13 +2.10
2 Maya Jacobson Quince Orchard 2014 -> 2015 -0.31 0.77 +1.08
3 Stephanie Joson Quince Orchard 2006 -> 2007 -0.29 0.76 +1.05
4 Isabelle Sajonia Quince Orchard 2014 -> 2015 -0.74 0.25 +0.99
5 Isabelle Sajonia Quince Orchard 2016 -> 2017 0.21 1.09 +0.88
6 Jade Lebrock Quince Orchard 2008 -> 2009 -1.15 -0.31 +0.84
7 Margaret Lilyestrom Quince Orchard 2016 -> 2017 -0.39 0.31 +0.70
8 Regina Schreiber Quince Orchard 2012 -> 2013 0.95 1.62 +0.67
9 Aimee Moores Quince Orchard 2006 -> 2007 0.79 1.41 +0.62
10 Aimee Moores Quince Orchard 2007 -> 2008 1.41 1.97 +0.56
11 Isabelle Latour Quince Orchard 2011 -> 2012 1.29 1.63 +0.34
12 Stephanie Joson Quince Orchard 2007 -> 2008 0.76 1.09 +0.33
13 Stephanie Joson Quince Orchard 2008 -> 2009 1.09 1.38 +0.29
13 Catherine Panasenkov Quince Orchard 2011 -> 2012 -0.27 0.02 +0.29
15 Megan McDanald Quince Orchard 2012 -> 2013 -0.83 -0.70 +0.13
15 Shannon Wagner Quince Orchard 2009 -> 2010 -0.48 -0.35 +0.13
17 Keegan Van Wert Quince Orchard 2011 -> 2012 -0.63 -0.52 +0.11
18 Eliana Krakovsky Quince Orchard 2014 -> 2015 -1.00 -0.93 +0.07
19 Catherine Panasenkov Quince Orchard 2010 -> 2011 -0.28 -0.27 +0.01

Girls - Greatest Career Z-Score ImprovementD

Rank Name School Career Leap Z1 Z2 Improvement
1 Regina Schreiber Quince Orchard 2010 -> 2013 -0.71 1.62 +2.33
2 Cierra Wells Quince Orchard 2011 -> 2012 -0.97 1.13 +2.10
3 Isabelle Sajonia Quince Orchard 2014 -> 2017 -0.74 1.09 +1.83
4 Stephanie Joson Quince Orchard 2006 -> 2009 -0.29 1.38 +1.67
5 Aimee Moores Quince Orchard 2006 -> 2008 0.79 1.97 +1.18
6 Maya Jacobson Quince Orchard 2014 -> 2015 -0.31 0.77 +1.08
7 Jade Lebrock Quince Orchard 2008 -> 2009 -1.15 -0.31 +0.84
8 Margaret Lilyestrom Quince Orchard 2015 -> 2017 -0.32 0.31 +0.63
9 Isabelle Latour Quince Orchard 2011 -> 2012 1.29 1.63 +0.34
10 Catherine Panasenkov Quince Orchard 2010 -> 2012 -0.28 0.02 +0.30
11 Megan McDanald Quince Orchard 2012 -> 2013 -0.83 -0.70 +0.13
12 Keegan Van Wert Quince Orchard 2011 -> 2012 -0.63 -0.52 +0.11
13 Julia Shapiro Quince Orchard 2008 -> 2011 -0.79 -0.69 +0.10
14 Eliana Krakovsky Quince Orchard 2014 -> 2015 -1.00 -0.93 +0.07

Girls - All-Time Most Weeks Ranked #1¹

Rank Name School Grad Year Weeks
No rankings found for this selection.

Girls - All-Time Most Weeks Ranked Top 10¹

Girls - All-Time Greatest Individual Ranking Improvement in a Week⁶

Rank Week Name School Grade R1 R2 Improvement
1 2012 Week 5 Cierra Wells Quince Orchard 10 46 23 +23 spots
2 2016 Week 6 Isabelle Sajonia Quince Orchard 11 76 54 +22 spots
3 2015 Week 3 Eliana Krakovsky Quince Orchard 11 58 37 +21 spots
3 2016 Week 8 Isabelle Sajonia Quince Orchard 11 53 32 +21 spots
5 2012 Week 7 Keegan Van Wert Quince Orchard 10 80 61 +19 spots
6 2010 Week 10 Regina Schreiber Quince Orchard 9 63 46 +17 spots
7 2013 Week 7 Megan McDanald Quince Orchard 10 85 71 +14 spots
7 2015 Week 4 Isabelle Sajonia Quince Orchard 10 62 48 +14 spots
9 2016 Week 5 Margaret Lilyestrom Quince Orchard 10 43 30 +13 spots
10 2006 Week 2 Violeta Duncan Quince Orchard 12 45 33 +12 spots
10 2006 Week 10 Stephanie Joson Quince Orchard 9 54 42 +12 spots
10 2008 Week 2 Madeline Kelly Quince Orchard 12 31 19 +12 spots
10 2012 Week 4 Cierra Wells Quince Orchard 10 58 46 +12 spots
14 2008 Week 7 Julia Shapiro Quince Orchard 9 70 59 +11 spots
14 2014 Week 3 Eliana Krakovsky Quince Orchard 10 68 57 +11 spots
16 2008 Week 7 Shannon Wagner Quince Orchard 10 49 39 +10 spots
16 2010 Week 2 Catherine Panasenkov Quince Orchard 10 33 23 +10 spots
16 2011 Week 8 Julia Shapiro Quince Orchard 12 71 61 +10 spots
16 2017 Week 6 Elizabeth Cassell Quince Orchard 12 75 65 +10 spots
20 2006 Week 6 Violeta Duncan Quince Orchard 12 35 26 +9 spots
20 2010 Week 4 Shannon Wagner Quince Orchard 12 29 20 +9 spots
20 2010 Week 5 Catherine Panasenkov Quince Orchard 10 25 16 +9 spots
20 2011 Final Keegan Van Wert Quince Orchard 9 62 53 +9 spots
20 2012 Week 7 Regina Schreiber Quince Orchard 11 26 17 +9 spots
20 2017 Week 6 Jamie Grossberg Quince Orchard 11 65 56 +9 spots

Girls - All-Time Most Ranking Entries and Re-Entries⁷

Rank Name School Grad Year Ranking Entries
1 Elizabeth Cassell Quince Orchard 2018 4 times
2 Eliana Krakovsky Quince Orchard 2017 3 times

Girls - All-Time #1 Ranked Athletes Per School⁸

Rank School Unique Athletes
No records found matching these criteria.

Girls - All-Time Top 10 Ranked Athletes Per School⁸

Rank School Unique Athletes
1 Quince Orchard 7

Girls - All-Time Ranked Athletes Per School⁸

Rank School Unique Athletes
1 Quince Orchard 33

Girls - All-Time Athlete-Weeks Ranked #1 Per School⁹

Rank School Athlete-Weeks
No records found matching these criteria.

Girls - All-Time Athlete-Weeks Ranked Top 10 Per School⁹

Rank School Athlete-Weeks
1 Quince Orchard 73

Girls - All-Time Athlete-Weeks Ranked Per School⁹

Rank School Athlete-Weeks
1 Quince Orchard 557

Girls - Most Athletes From One Team in a Week¹⁰

Rank Week School Athletes Ranked
1 2012 Week 6 Quince Orchard 8 athletes
2 2006 Week 6 Quince Orchard 6 athletes
2 2007 Week 5 Quince Orchard 6 athletes
2 2008 Week 9 Quince Orchard 6 athletes
2 2011 Week 5 Quince Orchard 6 athletes
2 2016 Week 3 Quince Orchard 6 athletes
7 2010 Week 7 Quince Orchard 5 athletes
7 2012 Preseason Quince Orchard 5 athletes
7 2014 Week 2 Quince Orchard 5 athletes
10 2008 Preseason Quince Orchard 4 athletes
10 2015 Week 5 Quince Orchard 4 athletes
10 2016 Preseason Quince Orchard 4 athletes
13 2017 Preseason Quince Orchard 2 athletes
14 2025 Week 1 Quince Orchard 1 athletes


Mind the toggle! Comparing boys and girls is not usually how we think about things, but this page offers boys and girls as a combined query option because it is very interesting to those who cherish school program performance.

AAll-Time Highest End-of-Season (EOS) Z-Scores - Z-score is a universally accepted statistic used to measure how far an individual performance deviates from the group baseline, normalized by the overall volatility or spread of the group. The Z-score is the number of standard deviations a specific data point is above or below the mean of its dataset or population. A z-score is a way to measure how normal or unusual a specific number is compared to the rest of the group. In this cross country ranking, it is how much a runner excels compared to other ranked runners (who are all considered very good). A negative Z-score is below average, which is fine in this context since there is a high bar to become ranked at all. A z-score of zero is average for a ranked runner. Z-Score = 1 is "Above Average": The value is 1 standard deviation above the mean. Z-Score = 2 is "Unusual / Exceptional": The value is 2 standard deviations above the mean. The runner has outperformed 98% of the group. Z-Score = 3 is "Extremely Rare / An Outlier": The value is 3 standard deviations above the mean. This is an extreme rarity. The runner outperformed 99.9% of the group. In data science and statistics, any data point with a Z-score of 3 or higher is officially flagged as an outlier - a number so high it almost looks like a typo. Z-Score = 4 is "Legendary": The value is 4 standard deviations above the mean. This is a "Black Swan" event. The odds of a Z-score reaching 4 naturally in a normal distribution are about 1 in 30,000. If you see a 4, it means the performance completely shattered the standard scale of competition.

More: Z-score is calculated using end-of-season (EOS) points. The ranking's point scale has shifted over the decades which makes a simple point total metric an unreliable indicator of best runners; however, Z-score remains a reliable metric for comparing the dominance of runners across the decades. Z-score is still limited by the same factors that limit this ranking system as a whole. Did the elite runner run their hardest in every race, or did they jog a few races to get to the post season? Did the elite runner log enough honest races by the state championship meet for their score to reflect their maximum ability? For the truly elite who value post-season races above all else, not always. Conversely, it is possible for elite athletes to "pad the stats" by beating up on a "weak" crop of ranked runners during any given year. Hence, why Z-score is a dominance metric.

BHypothetical All-Time Team Clash Based on Z-Score - This section uses only the highest end-of-season Z-score per athlete. The scoring table ranks runners by highest end-of-season (EOS) Z-score and uses standard cross country scoring of five scoring runners and two displacers. In this table, athletes are grouped by season so it essentially ranks the best single season teams in the ranking's history based on Z-score. Deviating from classic cross-country scoring, runners from incomplete teams are counted as displacers. This makes it more fun to look at for schools that do not have many years with 5+ ranked runners. Click the scoring breakdown to see the names of the athletes who comprise the top five from that school for that given year. Most people will probably prefer to see the best boys teams or girls teams. If you happened to select "Boys and Girls" from the toggle menu, it will indeed select a team of boys and girls from a given year. Boys and girls can compete on a level playing field of standard deviations. Take it or leave it! Remember from above that Z-score is a dominance metric which is a statistical proxy for best runners compared to the mean if every runner runs their hardest in every race.

CLargest Consecutive Season Z-Score Improvement calculates each runner's end-of-season Z-score year by year and compares each season to the immediately previous season only. It keeps only positive gains, then ranks the largest increases first to highlight the biggest single-year jumps in dominance.

DGreatest Career Z-Score Improvement evaluates multi-year development across an athlete's full tracked career window by comparing debut season end-of-season (EOS) Z-score to career end-of-season Z-score. It includes only positive growth with at least two varsity seasons and ranks the largest career gains first.

¹The Most Weeks Ranked stat is based on the # of rankings published. It is not based on calendar weeks. It is not consecutive weeks. The number of rankings published each season varied. There are typically 10 to 12 rankings published each season.

²The Highest All-Time Point Totals stat is not meant to infer a hierarchy of best runners. The point system evolves and cannot be compared across seasons. 2006 had inflated point totals relative to subsequent seasons due scoring changes after the first full season. The pandemic also shook things up with just a few races run in spring 2021. The ranking shown in this list is the rank at the time of the peak point total and not necessarily the peak ranking of that runner.

³The All-Time Highest Ranked Athlete stat displays the highest peak ranking by the top athletes for this school. The 'final season ranking' only includes rankings from the final ranking published each season. The final ranking of each season incorporates the most data and emphasizes championship races. EOS = End of Season. In the 'final season ranking' list, an athlete may be listed once per season.

⁴The All-Time Highest Ranked Freshmen stat lists the peak ranking for athletes in grade 9. The 'final season ranking' only includes rankings from the final ranking published each season. The final ranking of each season incorporates the most data and emphasizes championship races. EOS = End of Season.

⁵The Highest Debut Ranking stat shows the highest rankings at which individual athletes first appeared in the rankings. The original 2006 preseason rankings are excluded.

⁶The Greatest Individual Ranking Improvement in a Week identifies and ranks the individuals with the greatest ranking improvement in a single week. The athlete must be ranked both weeks to be considered. It excludes newly ranked runners. It excludes the ranking transition from final season rankings to the next preseason rankings.

⁷Progress is not linear for everyone. The Most Ranking Entries and Re-Entries stat shows athletes that had setbacks and kept working their way back onto the ranking at least two times after their initial debut. It is very common for athletes to fall off the rankings and get re-added later.

⁸The Most Ranked Athletes Per School stat adds the total number of unique athletes per school to ever achieve a #1 ranking, a top 10 ranking, or to ever appear on the ranking.

⁹The Most Athlete-Weeks Per School stat adds the total number of weeks that all individual athletes for each school were ranked #1, top 10, or ever ranked. For example, if athlete 'X' was ranked for 30 weeks in their high school career, and athlete 'Y' from the same school was ranked for 15 weeks in their high school career, that school would have accumulated 45 all-time athlete-weeks.

¹⁰The Most Athletes Ranked From One Team in a Week identifies and ranks the teams that have had the most runners ranked simultaneously. A team may be listed once for each year. The earliest week in the season where the team achieved the most runners for the season is shown.

Do you see a problem with this page? Do you have a suggestion for something new? E-mail webmaster@mocorunning.com.


Email | About | Misc